Ive been on the net since practically the beginning, so to speak. Working for Sun Microsystems for so long, way too long actually, I was harassing people on the usenet before most typed in their first WWW. Ok, perhaps I exaggerate but Ive been on for a while. I remember somewhere around 1989/90 when the priesthood conflict began and shortly thereafter Zadankai@nirvana.sun.com was created, as well as alt.religion.buddhism.nichiren. For me it all occurred at roughly the same period in my life.
Back then NSA/SGI was largely uncomfortable with the World Wide Web, even with e-mail. It was looked down upon to use e-mail to contact members. Leaders, and by this I mean my leaders, (territory, HQ, chapter level leaders) never posted to usenet, ever. I vaguely recall Ian McIllraith having a post or two forwarded to Zadankai, but I wouldnt swear to that.
There was no reform movement, no discussion at all other than bitter SGI hate-posts from long-time disgruntled ex-Gakkai members who abandoned their anti-SGI groups instantly after the formation of the temple group and ran to the priests for anti-Gakkai shelter. Bruce Maltz was a big player on ARBN and would soon be accused of a myriad of very unethical tricks such as using multiple anonymous e-mail addresses to fight his fights. Marc Herrick was a known personality and early member of the first Kempon Hokke Shu, and also had his picture taped to the desk of the San Jose Kaikan with a note do not admit. Fun days those were.
We have all come a long way, all in our own individual paths. But there is something lingering in the back of my mind that bugs me. Many of my leaders at that time had jobs in non-computer fields. Few besides me actually worked in the valley (read the Silicon Valley computer industry) and so it was understandable that there would be a long learning curve towards developing the awareness and understanding one usually needs before one is comfortable jumping into the vast cyber-ocean which we call the web.
It is now 2004. I am virtually alone as an SGI leader with any web presence. It is my perception that the leadership in the SGI became instantly self-censoring all those years ago and stayed that way. I can name not even a single district level leader, hell, not even a group-level leader that posts to any discussion groups or website, including even the SGI members-only group Zadankai.
Now back in the day Zadankai was considered a rebel entity of sorts. As we can now see Zadankai is considered by most to be mainstream Gakkai due to its membership constrictions.
I know the leaders to whom I am referring. I will not mention names, but they know who they are. These are not people whom I would have expected to remain shrunken from the net all these years. And yet I cannot imagine that they have self-censored for any reason other than simple fear. This could be fear from being held accountable, fear from having posts misused or quoted out of context, fear from disapproval for higher-up leadership, or perhaps the worst fear of all fear of exclusion from the tribe.
I would expect self-censoring in many religious arenas, but in the battlefield of Nichirens Buddhism? This was the very legacy that Nichiren left for us, his willingness to SPEAK UP and say what he felt was right and just. We will always run the risk of being misquoted, used and abused and scorned for our views. This is simply not a reason to cut out our own cyber-tongues and behave like some church elder.
I fear for myself the day when I become afraid to express myself openly. I realize that I change my mind and change my opinion freely and that there exists the chance that I will write something that I will have to uncomfortably live with, but dammitt, its not like Im going to live forever. Self-censorship is just as wrong as censorship. The years go by and those who remain silent find that they make no mark, no statement that they were even here and instead hide in the safety of the tribes in which they are members. Safety in numbers - just as when we were hiding from beasts in trees so long ago.
After all, were not talking about people who are incapable, were talking about those who are unwilling.
Rev. Greg, Shidoshi
Comments
Hi Rev. Greg,
I am barely computer literate myself, but curiously I seem to be the only Nichiren minister with a Net presence - at least in the English language corner of the web. I think the reason for this may be that, as you say, people are afraid of how their posts will be used. I think some may find the free for all nature of some internet discussions undignified. Some are not aware of how civilized moderated newsgroups are. But I do think there are some good reasons for not posting, which may apply to SGI leaders too. I think they are these:
1. Anyone in a leadership position who posts is in danger of being misunderstood as making official statements even when they are only trying to voice their private opinion. In my own case, I have been accused of being the "Pope of Nichiren Shu" in spite of the fact that I am no more than an unofficial assistant minister at the San Jose Temple. I am an ordained minister, but outside of that I have no official rank or standing other than being on the rolls at Admin H.Q. in Japan. And yet, because I am such a visible net presence I come off as though I am THE official spokeperson for Nichiren Shu. And that's not right really. So I can understand the reluctance of the other ministers to put themselves in the same position.
2. The other American ministers actually have their hands full with face-to-face Sanghas. In fact, one of them is the head minister of an established temple in Portland and is running a Sangha in Houston and the other is establishing a Temple in Kentucky. The one in Portland is also training three new novices. The other one has a wife and full time job. I too have a full time job, a family, and I am an assistant minister at San Jose. But until recently my interactions with other Nichiren Buddhists aside from Sundays has only been online. The upshot of this is that when one gets more involved with one's face to face Sangha it leaves less and less time for the Online "Sangha." There is a shift in priorities. But of course this may be different for different people. Some may have access to the net in ways that others don't.
3. Some people are just not writers. And to keep up with internet dialogue and debate, you really do need to be at least a bit of a writer or at least willing to put yourself out there as one. In my case, I rarely leave messages on voice-mail because I hate talking to machines. But for me writing is no problem. But I could see where for others it might seem a chore.
I bet I could think of some other reasons too. But I don't think it is always self-censorship or fear of speaking out. I think it does take a certain kind of person with a certain kind of priorities (I am not judging this as good or bad) and a particular set of circumstances to create a viable net presence. And even then, the abstract, overly intellecutal, reactive and contentious nature of the net is even offputting to me sometimes. It can suck you in and make you feel more critical or negative than you intended. So sometimes I see the reluctance to get too involved in online discussions as perhaps a very wise move.
Namu Myoho Renge Kyo,
Ryuei
Greg, you said that you "can name not even a single district level leader, hell, not even a group-level leader that posts to any discussion groups or website." I'm not sure what position Brian Holly currently holds, but isn't he a district or chapter leader? (I imagine he'll pop in here and clear this up.) And Jim Celer is, I believe, at least a chapter level leader.
And correct my if I'm wrong, but I think my dear friend, Kathy Ruby, is a district level leader, as well. There are probably others, and that tower of faith, Pat Matthews, is at least a group leader.
So, to put it bluntly, you biffed it on that note.
That's not to say I don't agree with the gist of what you wrote. It seems odd indeed that top leaders won't take the opportunity to engage with others, but I guess I understand it. Ryuei hit on some of the reasons.
And, of course, for the really thorny discussions, it's pretty hard to defend the indefensible. Better to simply decline to show up, yes? This prevents egg on face and a diet of crow.
Cheers!
Andy
Hey there Greg.
I'm a chapter level leader as well and I know what you mean.
I never posted on ARBN. It seemed to be full of anger and righteousness and conflict. What I saw was all about winning and little about understanding.
I post occasionally on a few of the groups when I think I have something worth saying. I try to follow Jim Rome's dictum, "Have a take and don't suck."
I have no idea why "Leaders" don't post. All it would have taken to defuse the IRG or the Reform movements would have been for Ted Morino or Greg Martin or Ian McIllreath to be available for an electronic chat for a couple of hours a week.
They might not have been able to address everyone's concerns to their satisfaction but displaying a willingness to listen in an open, insecure forum would have gone a long way toward making folks with issues feel like they weren't just being ignored or shunned.
Don't know if it's a group-think thing, a chicken-shit thing, or an orders-from-Japan thing, bit it is curious.
We had a University lecture a week ago in Flagstaff where several of our Youth Division presented President Ikeda's 2003 Peace Proposal to about a dozen guests from the University community. Normally, this would have been us presenting our stuff followed by some generic, basic questions, no big deal.
But one of the guests was dressed all in orange and claimed to be a Tibetan Buddhist named Swami _______ (don't remember his name but it was real difficult to pronounce). He claimed to be a full time peace pilgrim, to have toured Buddhist and Hindu temples all around the world and that WE did not know what we were talking about. He tried to correct our misunderstandings, for our own good. I was getting ready to bail the kids out when something remarkable happened. They reached deep down and brought up what they knew and were not intimidated. They either explained from personal experience or they described the evolution of Mahayana thought from Chih-i to Dengyo to Nichiren and respectfully disagreed with his "superior" understanding.
There was a lot of talking after the meeting and when it came time for the group picture, the youth asked Swami to be in it with us. He was happy to oblige and there was lots of hugging afterwards.
His confrontation allowed them to display their capability and compassion. He made the meeting much better than it otherwise would have been.
There was nothing to be afraid of but opportunity.
Thanks, Michael
Michael, that was a tremendous experience. Thanks so much for your reply, and thanks to everyone else, even Andy, for your replies.
Andy - Kathy Ruby doesn't count so erase one biff for me.
Rev. Greg
Maybe they just don't like the Internet! It's not everyone's cup of tea. Just because they don't communicate in the medium you choose, doesn't mean they are afraid or silent. If you don't read these internet groups, they may as well not exist.
Maybe SGI should host an official chat room/message board with leaders available to answer questions. Personally I think it's a good idea.
RG,S
As for me, there are sublties in the voice that are not present in the written word. As you can probably see, I am not a writer nor do I claim to be one. So many times my points get lost from my brain to the keyboard. As for our chapters and districts, many of them have websites here in denver. they are great for calendars and lists, but i think to have a true heart to heart, it seems so impersonal over the internet. I do believe however things will change with the next generation. I remember as a YMD, older mens div. having problems with pager, cell phones and the like.
So perhaps there will be a youth member who will host a chat site as John has suggested. And us old foggies will look in awe.
-robert
I'm a group leader and I've been posting for a long time! Not a particularly high mucky-muck, but carrying on at the district level.
Hey, if you work at Sun Microsystems, maybe you know my old college roomie, Constance McKenzie? Wonderful woman.
The problem with "leadership" (as I think you're defining it) having an e-presence is that everybody can read what you say and then anybody can hold you to it. Also, the web is nationwide and worldwide,and so many policies, etc. differ from region to region and area to area depending on who's in charge that it could create a lot of confusion (not that there isn't some already, but...) Anyway, say Hi to Connie for me, Greg. BEst, Byrd in LA
I was a district leader until about 5 years ago. - Brian
We all know that the internet is just another form of destructive mind control.
No wonder SGI leaders are afraid of it.
They should be.
In fact, by reading Greg's blog, you have all become unwitting dupes in his plans for world domination.
Don't say I didnt warn you.
Lee
are we being converted to the borg?
The correct word is ASSIMILATED Robert.
RG,S
Greg:
Good point...some factual errors...
I'm a group chief...
)and Kathy Ruby DOES count...thank you very much...)
Zone leader Bruce Barnes was active for a while, but has vanished...where are you, Bruce??
Jonathan Wilson is a leader(?) in Philadelphia and a consultant in photography for the World Tribune...he wroe an article on financial disclosure for this very website...
Didn't Bill Aiken post here once?
Yes, you DO have a point...I know Greg Martin's been burned on the net by being misquoted out of context, etc...
But I do worry that our leadership is literally afraid to speak freely on the net...for whatever reasons...
Look at my posts and you'll see an embarrassing trail of ranting, raving half truths and nonsense...yes, this may come back to haunt me, but it's far healthier to speak freely and engage in "death defying" dialogue...
That's the rub, I think...Ikeda encoutrages "death-defying" dialogue...dialgue in which we examine our most closely held beliefs with the understanding that some of them may not survive the scrutiny...
Perhaps that frightens those who prefer beliefs that fit nicely into the slots assigned...it is a challenge to discover that something you've considered an absolute truth just ain't so...it requires a complete re-assessment of all your beleif structures...
This very fact is why I engage in dialogue...and I do engage with top SGI leaders via email...although you must first develop some relationship with them...they are very busy...
But, yes, you are right...and I fear that self censorship...a remnant of earlier gakkai training...is a core cause of the absence of leaders on the net...
Ask them!
David
Sorry,
Are we being Assimilated?
-robert
Greg,
Just one comment: There are many of us who are group or district leaders in SGI who post to the boards on the net. Most do not identify themselves as such.
Peace out,
Craig
Greg,
You wrote:
"Andy - Kathy Ruby doesn't count so erase one biff for me."
Why does Kathy Ruby not count? Why is it that you and several others around find it okay to be nasty to Kathy and Terry while bemoaning the fact that SGI leader's do not speak up. Maybe you just want those who agree with you to speak up.
I agree with you more than you know, but to constantly use the Ruby's as the official whipping couple of the reform minded folks is a little off putting and does nothing for your cause.
You can make your points without being hard on these folks. They are as human as you and I am sure can be hurt by such comments.
Thanks,
Craig
Ok fine, now YOU don't count.
Just keep it up and you know what's gonna happen....
MINIONS!
Rev. Greg