BuddhaJones.org Archive Project

Free Nichiren Buddhism

← Blog Index BuddhaJones Blog Archive · 2003–2004
January 03, 2004 Lisa

SGI Membership Stats

SGI claims millions of members worldwide -- between 10 and 12 million -- including hundreds of thousands in the U.S. In May 2002, SGI-USA's spokesperson told Congress dead link that SGI-USA has a membership of 300,000. In November 2003, SGI claimed 350,000 members in North America.

Some academic dead link surveys and other sources estimate that there are somewhere between one and two million Buddhists in the U.S. That includes practitioners of Zen, Tibetan traditions, etc., as well as Nichiren Buddhists. And, judging from the 65,000 people who showed up in Central Park dead link to hear the Dalai Lama, millions of Americans have at least some interest in Buddhism.

But I'm not the only one who thinks that SGI-USA overstates its membership numbers, and SGI-USA has yet to provide an explanation for how it arrives at its membership stats. Personally, I think the SGI sounds a lot like Scientology in claiming a membership of millions dead link . Is this the company dead link SGI members want to keep?

Last year on BuddhaJones, I cited several instances unavailable of SGI-USA's fibbing, including membership stat fibs. In response, I received many letters and other communications that, in sum, advised me: "If you don't like it, change it." I replied to one person: "Gee, if you work really hard in your district, maybe SGI corporate will stop lying."

Members who feel that they cannot wholeheartedly support the policies of the SGI corporate entity are often told that they need to redouble their efforts to change the SGI for the better. Presumably, this change must come about through some magical rather than democratic means, considering that SGI members have no voting rights in their own organization, have no formal grievance procedure, have no formal means for assuring that their voices are heeded by those who make corporate decisions.

Members don't even have the right to manage their local center. Members in one large U.S. city joke that the chief SGI administrator of their Culture Center will "die in his chair," and, until then, he will "run" the local organization as he sees fit. SGI members are not even allowed to know how much money SGI-USA has, where it comes from or how it is allocated.

Now, many SGI members will read what I just wrote and accuse me of whining. "Never give up!" they will say. "You must try harder! To change the world, you must first start by changing SGI!" Other SGI members will advise me: "Chant to change yourself so these petty organizational things don't bother you. Chant to elevate your life."

Either way, the reasoning goes, individual members are entirely responsible for everything that is broken in the organization. And they must fix it, if they are serious about fixing it, through sincere and dedicated Buddhist practice. To me, this sounds a lot like an alcoholic holding his or her co-dependent spouse responsible for the circumstances in which they find themselves and smugly saying, "Chant about it."

Is it any wonder why people stay in SGI, trying ever more desperately to convince themselves and others that staying is the best -- the only! -- thing to do? And is it any wonder why people drift or stomp away from SGI?

To me, there are bigger fish to fry, more urgent problems to address through Buddhist practice than the deliberate, incorrigible mismanagement of a religious corporation. Yet the very deliberateness of this mismanagement fascinates me -- it's the subject of the novel I'm writing. So I keep my eye on SGI.

Anyway, my whole point in writing this missive is to reply to a letter that an SGI member sent to BuddhaJones unavailable about inflated membership stats. He wrote: "This has knocked me right out of my comfort zone. Please help me -- I want to be a believer."

My response is that belief in and allegiance to SGI are not necessary for one to be an exemplary practitioner of Nichiren Buddhism. I think the important thing is to stick with one's Buddhist practice and study the writings of Nichiren. No matter what organization we join, one way or another we all need to develop a spirit of independence in the sense that we are confident about our own practice and heart, and can trust our own life/wisdom for "guidance."

Many people think that the only way to change or find security in the world is through collective action, so they cleave to organizations and groups -- and perhaps gravitate toward the ones that claim to be the "fastest growing" or "most influential." But Nichiren Buddhism teaches that all the power in the universe exists within a single moment of one's life. It's more important to discover what Nichiren actually meant by this than to believe in the power, influence or righteousness of any group.

Take care,
Lisa J.

Comments

I've studied and used to practice Zen Buddhism in the UK and though I'd no longer describe myself as an adherent, I've often wondered why there's a need for large Buddhist organisations in this way. All follow their own path without need for reassurance in numbers, surely?
A shame that there are weaknesses within SGI but is that an unfortunate tendency of humans rather than wilful mismanagement? I was very interested in this as I've not heard anything like this in any Buddhist organisation before. Keep up the good work.
Pease & Light.

Hi Lisa! Thanks for discussing this particular irrationality. I also wonder why, especially given PI's repeated guidance to speak out about injustice, that speaking out against injustice in SGI is not considered to be taking action? Best - Brian

Hi, Lisa. For some reason I can't post a comment on your blog from my work account. Anyway, here's one:

What's interesting (and a little amusing) is that the best estimate I have seen of the SGI-USA membership count is in a book sponsored by the
SGI-USA, and sold in its bookstores. Check out "Soka Gakkai in America" by Hammond and Machacek. These fellows, independent university scholars and well qualified statisticians, were given access to WT and membership records, such as they are, and did a very careful statistical analysis in 1997-98. It's all detailed in that book, and they came up with a membership count of about 33,000, if memory serves, in 1997. The SGI-USA's best reporting since then has, at most, about 2,000 new members per year, so the most it could be today is about 45,000 (if nobody departed in the interim, which is a big "if").
You'd think they'd read their own books, wouldn't you?
Cheers!
Andy Hanlen

Lisa

I asked an SGI staffer/friend about the 350,00 figure...he said, in effect.."Depends on one's definitions, don't you think? How do the
Methodists count, for example, or the Jews or the Catholics? They aren't nearly
so careful as we've been in the past. Anyone who was ever a member, or family or
whatever. How many active people do we have, people coming to meetings, subscribing, participating in contributions, children, etc..... I believe its about 100K. How many other
people, using the same standards as other religions use, would be considered SGI
Buddhists?
350,000 is not an unresonable estimate. Hard to know for sure but the number of people who have joined over the decades is many times
higher than that. At any rate, what's the point anyway? We'll never really know with any certainty..."

I leave it to you to analyze that statement...

David

Dave, the point is: if SGI doesn't know, then why does SGI publicly make membership claims in the first place? They claimed a certain membership number to Congress to show how much clout SGI has. They claimed a certain membership number in the publications to create the impression of organizational growth in terms of new members. In other words, they make the claim for the effect it will have on others -- and if the claim is exaggerated, then clearly the effect is to mislead. That's the point and that's why some people have a problem with it: these claims are misleading.

The quote you included makes me wonder: Why are SGI leaders -- especially those who believe that there are about 100,000 members -- comfortable with SGI making misleading claims about the organization? Are you comfortable with that?

Lisa:

Yes, I do have problems with that...I was just conveying an opinion from the SGI staffer...I was surprised to hear him say that "many times more" than 350,000 have been shakubukued in North America...that seems untrue to my understanding...

We live in an age when, apparently, in politics and religion, putting a "spin" on every position is deemed moral and unavoidable...

Yes, other religions do the same...but I would hope to hold the SGI to a higher standard...but, there are those who don't agree...

It makes me wonder about Japan's claim of 12 million...If they use the same sort of fuzzy math, then maybe their active membership is only 3 or 4 million...

The numbers have no meaning...when those who compile them value "spin" over honesty...

Actually, I think it's true that many times more than 350,000 have been shakubukued. Back when Mr. Williams was General Director, membership figures where based on Gohonzon conferral, and that was up over 500,000 by the time he was ousted.

Of course, most of those Gohonzon ended up in trash cans, but I think the number bears out the claim, as surely 3 or 4 people were introduced for every one that got taken to Gojukai.

My best guess, based on WT numbers and my own observations about the ratio of members to subscribers, is that there are probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 40,000 real members, and maybe the same number of folks who still consider themselves members even though they are wholly inactive.

Brian

← More On Islam Blog Index My Brother Chimes In →

About This Project

BuddhaJones.org Archive Project seeks to collect and preserve information related to Nichiren Buddhism in America. All copyrighted content is presented here without permission under Fair Use guidelines, explicitly for the purposes of research, teaching, criticism, comment, and news reporting. This is a nonprofit, educational site unaffiliated with any religious organization or corporation.