The only problem I have with the Gandhi-King-Ikeda Exhibit is that it's a big fib. To rank Daisaku Ikeda alongside Gandhi and King is disingenuous -- and that's the nicest word I have for it.
The University of Denver, which is now hosting the exhibit dead link , says: "Indias Mahatma Gandhi, the American Martin Luther King Jr. and Japans Daisaku Ikeda each made a significant impact through peaceful protest for the cause of human rights."
Peaceful protest for the cause of human rights? In the case of Gandhi and King, that's absolutely correct. In the case of Ikeda, that's hilarious.
Gandhi and King were harassed and jailed by the government, yet still managed to change the law in their respective nations. Meanwhile, Ikeda built an outrageously wealthy religious corporation, paid enormous sums for Renoirs and other works of art, and started a political party that is now in the ruling coalition in Japan.
In other words, Ikeda became the establishment and, arguably, the goverment -- peaceniks should note that Ikeda's party, the New Komeito, supports sending Japanese troops to Iraq. Where is Ikeda's record of nonviolent protest for the sake of human rights? Where is his bus boycott? Or his salt march? Ikeda did spend some time in jail -- for electioneering, I think it was, but he was cleared of all wrongdoing.
I assume that if you're reading this blog, you already know quite a lot about SGI, Daisaku Ikeda and Nichiren Buddhism. The Gandhi-King-Ikeda Exhibit is apparently for those who know nothing about these things and therefore cannot critically evaluate the claims that are being made about Ikeda. In my view, the exhibit is an obvious attempt to mislead idealistic college students into thinking that SGI and Ikeda are synonymous with nonviolence and peace activism.
From the other side of its mouth, the SGI claims to be the only organization in the world that promotes and teaches a correct understanding of Nichiren Buddhism. FYI, Buddhism and Gandhism unavailableare perhaps similar, but significantly different.
This exhibit reminds me of how SGI (when it was called NSA) was busted by the Boston Globe dead link for cloaking itself in American patriotism to gain access to classrooms and children. In both cases -- with the Liberty Bell ruse and now with the G-K-I exhibit -- SGI is misrepresenting itself in the name of "making friends."
Dr. Lawrence Carter of Morehouse College dead link -- who claims that he came up with the idea for this exhibit on his own, without financial consideration from SGI -- has said that he wanted to show that three people from different religions and cultures could successfully apply the principles of nonviolence. In that case, the Dalai Lama would have been a better choice. The Dalai Lama is the real deal when it comes to nonviolence.
It's one thing to say you're committed to nonviolence (as Ikeda perhaps claims), and another thing to say it while the Chinese army is shelling your house and murdering your country, as in the case of the Dalai Lama. Oh -- and let's not forget that Ikeda and SGI created an exhibit to honor one of the men responsible for the Tibetan genocide, "The Great Leader Zhou Enlai dead link ."
Please check out the video that accompanies the Gandhi-King-Ikeda exhibit dead link . At about 18 minutes and 35 seconds into it, Dr. Carter says that Daisaku Ikeda is Gandhi, King and Jesus all rolled into one! No lie.
The video claims that Ikeda has distinguished himself by dedicating his life to championing the work of Gandhi and King. Huh? In the SGI, we are told all the time that Ikeda is great because he propagates the teachings of Nichiren, and that he is the foremost practitioner of Nichiren Buddhism in the world. Funny, that's never mentioned in the video -- especially funny considering that the video was written, produced and directed by a group of hardcore SGI members.
In other words, in my opinion, the video brazenly misrepresents Ikeda's work, and glosses over the fact that for more than 40 years (longer than Castro has been dictator of Cuba?) Ikeda has been the charismatic leader of a controversial and often-fanatical religious sect. (And let's not forget that Ikeda gave Castro an award on behalf of Soka University, and recently reiterated his praise for Castro's peace efforts! Scroll down to Feb. 8, 2004 at this link dead link to read Ikeda's remarks.)
On top of it all, the video itself is an example of revisionist history. For months, the video was on SGI's web site, but was taken down, edited, and re-posted. What was edited? Remember our good friend Dr. Alfred Balitzer, who once sang the praises unavailableof Daisaku Ikeda louder than anyone outside of SGI? He used to be in the G-K-I video, singing the praises of Ikeda as usual, but he was recently cut from the show. Balitzer, as you may remember, was the dean of faculty at Ikeda's Soka University. He was involved with the school being sued for religious discrimination unavailableby former professor Linda Southwell.
Dr. Lawrence Carter may be Ikeda's biggest fan and promoter right now -- as Dr. Alfred Balitzer once was. But I've seen how quickly things can change.
Comments
Congratulations, Lisa. You have, once again, gone right to the heart of the matter, and displayed, in my opinion, a considerable amount of courage in so doing. No facts cited by you can be shown to be in error, and the opinions you express are entirely reasonable.
Kind of sad, isn't it, that an organization with such potential, and ostensibly based on the rock-solid truths of Nichiren Buddhism, sees fit to continue such displays of downright dishonesty, and a contemptuous disregard for truth?
Keep up the good work.
Andy Hanlen
Lisa,
You are an excellent tabloid journalist who covers her behind from all directions.
I pity your distorted vision of SGI and Mr. Ikeda for you are unable to see events with the Buddhas eye and possibly may never be able to vision any new pictures other than displayed in your heretical website. Your type of parasite is depicted and predicted in the Gosho to emerge at the time of propagation of the law therefore, Im not a bit surprised by your composure and distorted comments.
Please maintain your function to prove the righteousness of SGI, Mr. Ikeda and people with the same vision as his.
Micha
So Micha just kicked your BUTT Lisa! What do you have to say for yourself now??
Plus, I have a strong feeling that you've cursed yourself. I'm not standing by YOU in a lightening storm.
Rev. Greg
I've got a book recommendation for Micha: Combatting Cult Mind Control by Steven Hassan
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0892813113 dead link
Learn the difference between brainwashing and mind control. If you think you're too smart or too aware (or too "sincere") to fall for mind control techniques, this book may surprise you.
LJ
Problem is, Lisa, in order for Micha to benefit from your kind and considerate suggestion, he'd have to READ the book you recommend. The problem with that is that it's not on the SGI approved reading list, so it's unlikely that he will ever get a chance to see it.
Too bad, but at least no one can fault you for lacking compassion.
Cheers!
Andy Hanlen
Lisa,
Your intelligence and the intelligence of others can never sway a person of faith, which I doubt you know what it means to have faith or possess such. There are numerous books out there to discredit people of faith as lost brainwashed mind controlled souls. The truth is that you actually are the prisoner of your own mind brainwashed with your own intelligence. You may never be able to conceive the true meaning of faith. It is just beyond your intelligent comprehension.
You must be viewing faith as a brainwash or a mind control slumber of people who get caught and trapped by conniving power hungry people who control them otherwise you would not recommend a book that obviously is not admired by people of faith but rather admired by people like you who cannot get over their self impressed brilliance of their minds.
Micha
Hi Lisa.
Combatting Cult Mind Control was an important read for me. I knew SGI-USA (NSA at the time) was not a dangerous cult but I also knew that it sometimes behaved like one. This book helped me sort out the issues.
I recently watched a video of President Ikeda's November 13 speech at a headquarters meeting in Japan. He mentioned many accomplishments the SGI had achieved. The North American membership #s sounded pretty dubious to me. He talked about all the awards and honorary degrees he had received. He almost made it sound like he was talking about someone else or the organization as a whole had received the honors, like they were a badge of legitimacy for the SGI.
I think the G-K-I exhibit may be like that somehow, conveying legitimacy to the SGI and Nichiren Buddhism through President Ikeda. Probably another one of those Japanese things I don't understand.
BTW, I think the very difficult growing pains of SUA are really important for Kosen Rufu. Aside from Japanese culture, there is Gakkai culture. If Gakkai culture can adapt to and mesh with the American academic scene with all of its egos and politics and other baggage then there is real hope for the future of KR in America.
Thanks, Michael
Ya gotta love Micha. He (she?) talks to Lisa about "...a book that obviously is not admired by people of faith..."
What's really a hoot is that I guaran-damn-tee you that (a) Micha has never looked at the book in question and (b) Micha has never even read so much as a review, pro OR con, of said book.
In essence, Micha is a mind-numbed true believer who, by simply existing, proves the legitimacy and validity of the book Lisa recommends.
Life is simple really, and fun, too.
Cheers!
Andy Hanlen
Michael,
What is the deference between a person who attends a discussion meeting and shares his/her own practices merits verses president Ikeda sharing the merits of his practice to a bigger audience?
Answer; essentially there is no deference. The only deference is in the eye of the beholder. To a person who shares his or her experience and achievements in a discussion meeting, no one would label him or her to have a self-absorbed intentions since his or her experience is obviously encourages others. However when president Ikeda, who is a member just like you and, I shares his achievements to a bigger audience, those who do have a self-absorbed practice immediately brand him as one. Unfortunately, they cannot recognize it for this is the very reason of them having a self-absorbed practice to begin with.
The second point is if you think the number of members pronounced is dubious. Break it down to a chapter or a district level and realize that just because people do not attend on a regular basis a discussion meeting, does not disqualify them to be counted as members.
We have many people who are in our district and chapter lists who do attend once in a long time meetings. Does that means we should not consider them members?
I do not think so. Any one who has not declared him/her self no longer a member of SGI is always remain a member. Youll never know what will trigger their rededication to the practice of correct a faith again. So the membership numbers pronounced may sound dubious in comparing those who are regularly attending meetings but in reality the number reflects those who are still on our membership list that can be accounted for.
After all no one is going to excommunicate Lisa Jones as long she does not resign being an SGI member therefore she may very well still be on the list in a hope that maybe one day shell get what it mean to have faith in Nichirens Buddhism. Yes she still has a hope.
Micha
Greetings All,
It appears that everyone here does not like Mr. Ikeda. And perhaps I am the only supporter of him.
I would like to point out that there are just as many detractors of both King and Gandhi.
I have a very close friend who was the principle speech writer for Martin (as he was known by his friends). There were many stories he shared with me about King and how he was so hated by his contemporaries, just as you all feel towards Ikeda.
In India, it is the same thing towards Gandhi. I have spent time there and have many discussions the people that live there.
We forget that we are all human beings. We are all working towards something great to help other people. But when we put them up on an alter only to be dissapointed when we find out they are human, who's fault is it?
With all this negative energy, if we let it go and focus on creating value with our lives and being confident with who we are so others can work towards peace in thier own way.
Not at all Robert.
I consider myself a disciple, not a follower of President Ikeda. I want to see his dreams for Kosen Rufu realized because that is also the Daishonin's will and mine too for that matter.
I am a stickler for the truth. I do not like spin. That is the main reason I am no longer a Christian. I am not willing to try to fit into Gakkai culture just for the sake of getting along when that culture, as it sometimes expresses itself, makes Kosen Rufu more difficult.
I think the film "Embattled Buddhists" is an accurate portrail of the hostile environment the Gakkai faces in Japan. I think the SGI's leadership believes preserving the Daishonin's true intent is paramount for Kosen Rufu.
I agree. I just think some of the strategies and tactics that are used in Japan are often counter-productive here because the environment is so different. We are gradually figuring out what works and what doesn't. We need to convince the top leaders in Japan that we can be trusted not to drop the ball on the "Daishonin's true intent" thing. Then perhaps we will have earned some breathing space to pursue Kosen Rufu in a more American way.
Thanks, Michael
Michael,
I completely agree with you. I am not an apoligist for the SGI. I feel that we must self relect on our own behavior and learn to trust people more. We should hold people accountable for their behavior as well as our own. There is that old saying that I may not be able to change someone else, but i can sure change myself.
Currently I am faced with some issues here locally and I am speaking up and drawing light on the matter, but if I throw a tantrum and leave, what changes will occur? i will become an agry person and sgi-usa will move on. i would rather internalize those changes so i can truly walk my talk.
My understanding of kosen-rufu means to relieve the suffering. no where does it talk about relgious conversions or which buddhist practice is correct and which is not. During the 60's , 70's and 80's there was the rhetoric about ND's Buddhism. I think that was mostly misinterpretaions that were used to manipulate people, but if all the critics leave, how can we change?