Soka University
of America was founded eighteen months ago by Soka Gakkai International,
a controversial lay Buddhist organisation. Situated in California,
the University is committed to egalitarianism, world peace, and
aims to turn its students into "global citizens". But
staff are leaving, amid claims of secrecy and sectarian prejudice.
Details or Transcript:
Stephen Crittenden: If you were
watching ABC-TV’s Compass program around this time last
year, you may have seen an episode on the Buddhist group Soka
Gakkai. Soka Gakkai originated in Japan as an offshoot of Nichiren
Buddhism, but today it’s a global concern, known as Soka
Gakkai International, claiming twelve million followers in 177
countries. Soka Gakkai owns newspapers, TV and radio stations,
art museums, schools and universities – and in fact in 2001,
it opened a new university in Southern California: a liberal arts
college founded on principles of global citizenship, peace and
egalitarianism.
But 18 months down the track, things are far from
peaceful among the groves of academe at Soka University. David
Rutledge reports.
CHANTING: Nam myoho renge kyo
David Rutledge: Soka Gakkai practitioners
believe that chanting the lotus sutra will bring them prosperity.
And if the vast fortune of Soka Gakkai International is anything
to go by, there’s been a lot of effective chanting going
on over the years. It’s hard not to draw comparisons between
Soka Gakkai and those Protestant Christian groups who believe
that material wealth is a sign of divine favour. And in fact,
Soka Gakkai has its own Protestant history. For centuries, Soka
Gakkai has been associated with Nichiren Buddhism, which has its
traditional hierarchy of priests. But after the Second World War,
relations between the Nichiren priesthood and the Soka Gakkai
laity deteriorated, and in 1992 the priesthood excommunicated
the laity – and Soka Gakkai was born as an independent new
religious movement.
Well, a new revolt against a different kind of
authority is now brewing at the newly-founded Soka University
in Southern California. In March this year, reports began to surface
in the local media that faculty and students were leaving, amid
claims that the university wasn’t living up to its egalitarian
principles. One of the faculty members jumping ship was Anne Houtman,
Professor of Biology and Assistant Dean of Faculty. For her, the
experience of working at Soka University was one of high expectations
and rude awakenings.
Anne Houtman: About three-and-a-half
years ago, there was a small ad in Science magazine for a biologist
to help start a new private liberal arts college in Southern California.
They said they were a university based on Buddhist principles,
and they were non-sectarian, but they were based on the Buddhist
ideas that of course are very attractive to a lot of people.
David Rutledge: And were your
first impressions of the place favourable?
Anne Houtman: Absolutely, really
neat people. I didn’t know – they didn’t tell
me, and I didn’t know at the time – that any of them
were Soka Gakkai. I assumed they weren’t, because they referred
to the Soka Gakkai as sort of the parent organisation, and referred
to it as this thing far away – it was giving us the funding,
but we were the experts so we were going to design everything.
It turns out later that they were all Soka Gakkai, and when I
spoke to them about the endowment, besides having a half-billion
dollar campus that was already paid for and in the process of
being built, they also had a half- billion dollar endowment.
David Rutledge: They weren’t
just Southern Californian hippies?
Anne Houtman: Yes, they weren’t
some kind of “oh, wouldn’t it be fun to have, like,
this idealist liberal arts college where we all, you know, had
the same size of office” – that was one of their things,
about how they were non-hierarchical, and everyone had the same
sized office. But there was funding behind it, so it wasn’t
going to disappear overnight.
David Rutledge: So when did things
start to go wrong for you?
Anne Houtman: Well for me, it
took a while. For the early faculty, there were kind of red flags
right away, there were really deep concerns by some of the early
faculty – all of whom have left now, either by being fired
or by choosing to leave – they were really concerned about
the relationship between the funding organisation, Soka Gakkai,
and Soka University, and they felt that decision-making was happening
in a very secretive and hierarchical way, and we weren’t
being told a lot of what was going on, the faculty.
At the time I thought “well, they’re
just paranoid”, you know, but then when I became Assistant
Dean and then Acting Dean of the Faculty, I started seeing things
happening that I was very concerned about. And it was clear, I
think, that the early faculty who left were right.
David Rutledge: So what sort
of evidence did you have that the administration was secretive
and hierarchical, what kinds of things were going on there?
Anne Houtman: Well, the one that
really started jumping out at us was that the faculty –
who were actually really fantastic faculty, lots of experience,
really collegial people, really good at their jobs – would
after spending days and days making decisions, doing research
on what sorts of programs, and then we’d come to consensus
on what was the best thing for the curriculum and for the students,
then those decisions would be overturned by an administration
that had no experience in academic administration at all. That
continued to happen, and it was clear that decisions were being
made in ways that the faculty weren’t aware of.
David Rutledge: Anne Houtman,
ex-Dean of Faculty at Soka University.
Arch Asawa is Soka University’s Vice-President.
And I put it to him that maybe the problem was one of unrealistic
expectations: Western ideas of what Buddhism ought to be about,
coming up against the reality of Soka Gakkai, which has its own
rules and its own ways of running an institution.
Arch Asawa: Well, I think Buddhism
in general is probably unfamiliar to many Westerners, and in fact
the Soka Gakkai is in fact a very recognised Buddhist organisation
in Japan. But I can’t speak on behalf of them, I’m
primarily a representative of the university.
David Rutledge: You are a Soka
Gakkai member yourself?
Arch Asawa: Personally, I am,
yes, but that's just my own personal practice; I don’t know
what bearing it might have in regard to this particular interview.
So I’m here as a representative of the university, and I
think if you want to get insight on questions about the Soka Gakkai,
I would refer those questions to a Soka Gakkai International representative.
David Rutledge: In terms of administration,
though, I understand that the university board and senior administration
have more business backgrounds, and actually have rather little
experience in educational administration; is that correct?
Arch Asawa: I think that’s
not necessarily true. If you were to look at a large part of our
faculty, you’d see that a lot of them are quite experienced.
Like our current Acting Dean of Faculty has more than thirty years
in academia, our Provost has a very extensive background in academia.
So I would not tend to characterise us in that fashion.
David Rutledge: Soka University
Vice President, Arch Asawa.
Well Anne Houtman, of course, doesn’t agree
that the university’s administrative staff are sufficiently
experienced in their work. But she also has a more serious claim
to make.
Anne Houtman: I don’t want
to talk too much about it, because my lawyer said not to –
but there’s real discrepancies in salary, and in hiring
and firing decisions based on whether or not you were a member
of the Soka Gakkai. And I saw those salary data as an Acting Dean
of Faculty; it was very clear to me that there’s a definite
bonus attached to being a Soka Gakkai member.
David Rutledge: Anne Houtman,
airing claims that Soka University Vice President Arch Asawa rejects.
Arch Asawa: I would say those
are really unfounded. In terms of looking at salaries, if one
were to take a look at the various types of salaries, one would
not see any type of discrimination on that basis. The majority
of the faculty and staff are in fact not members of SGI, and I
don’t see any evidence whatsoever of there being any kind
of discrimination being practiced here.
David Rutledge: I also understand
that a number of non-Soka Gakkai faculty and students are actually
leaving, or thinking of leaving.
Arch Asawa: Actually, I think
this may have been more exaggerated than what the truth would
be told. If one were to look at the total number of faculty retained
since we’ve opened, actually our retention rate is 86% among
the faculty. And then in terms of students, we have a 96% retention
ratio after our first year of operation. So I think that those
stories that you’ve heard have been exaggerated to a great
degree.
David Rutledge: Ex-Dean of Faculty
Anne Houtman, on the other hand, says that many non-Soka Gakkai
faculty members and students are looking for the exit –
it’s just that they’re not telling the senior administration.
Anne Houtman: Well you know –
I don’t want to “out” anyone because it’s
such an environment for retribution right now, that everyone’s
kind of fearful – but I would say that most of the faculty
who are not Soka Gakkai are looking actively to be somewhere else.
David Rutledge: And what about
the students, what has their experience been?
Anne Houtman: Well yes, the students
have a lot of concerns. Now, the students are well over 90% Soka
Gakkai themselves, but there’s a lot of anxiety –
especially with the American students, the Japanese students are
much more comfortable with a sort of more hierarchical model of
decision-making and so forth – but the American students
are really deeply concerned. And a lot of them, some of our very
best students, have already left, they’ve transferred to
other places, or just left. And a lot of students are leaving
at the end of this year, many of whom will not admit to fellow
students that they’re leaving, but they’ve told faculty
that they’re leaving.
David Rutledge: Management says
that the university is just experiencing teething problems, and
that they’re still very much on a learning curve. What’s
your response to that?
Anne Houtman: Well that’s
what they would say. I mean, they’re up for accreditation
right now, they’re being looked at very closely. I doubt
very much that they would say “yes, in fact we are doing
illegal hiring, illegal firing, salary differences based on religion”,
I don’t think they would admit to that. Both because it’s
illegal, and because it would be very difficult to get accreditation
if they did.
Stephen Crittenden: Anne Houtman,
former Dean of Faculty at Soka University in Southern California.
Guests on this program:
Anne Houtman
Former Dean of Faculty, Soka University of America
Archibald Asawa
Vice-President, Soka University of America
Read more
about Soka.